Search blog.co.uk

Amount and number

by loiswakeman @ 21 Mar. 2008 - 23:02:59

"Furthermore, the survey revealed that attendees were very satisfied with the amount of sessions offered in the fields of systems and technology" - report in tcworld, the trade journal of tekom, the German professional association for technical communication and Information-Development

A bit embarrassing this one. tekom is a sister organisation of my trade body, the ISTC. In the very same issue of its magazine, a contributor explains the importance of not only translating the words, but also the meaning and culture, of a text.

A native English speaker will sense (if not knowing why) that amount of sessions is wrong, because amount refers to a measurable quantity of something (like 100 grams of sand or  2 litres of water), not an integer number of discrete things (like six buckets of water).

I have mentioned before that it is unwise, if one wishes to be taken seriously, to rely on DIY translations without using the services of a native speaker to -  at least - proof a translation. I might have hoped that an organisation of professional writers would do the same!

Comments: Hide subcomments

tylluanpenrytylluanpenry pro
21/03/08 @ 23:22

Oh dear..... I've been checking through the proofs on my book all this week, and I know how hard it can be! But DIY translations are always dangerous, just think of Pedro Carolino and his little 'English as she is spoke' phrase book!

loiswakemanloiswakeman [Member]
http://lois.co.uk
27/03/08 @ 19:38

I used to hate proofing - one only ever notices the glaring error when the author's copy plops on the doormat, in my experience!

LissaTLissaT pro
22/03/08 @ 10:46

I am sure you have already dealt with less and fewer which have me shouting at the television three or four times in every news programme.

By the way, does an infinitive not count as split if the splitting is done between dashes? (See your penultimate sentence.)

loiswakemanloiswakeman [Member]
http://lois.co.uk
27/03/08 @ 19:37

I think I am guilty on that count!

Less and fewer needs to be added to the list.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).

Recent Posts

  1. Elegant variation
    by loiswakeman on 02 May. 2008
  2. You *must* try this product - not
    by loiswakeman on 01 May. 2008
  3. Discrete and discreet
    by loiswakeman on 23 Apr. 2008
  4. You are [insert random words here]
    by loiswakeman on 15 Apr. 2008
  5. Rein and reign
    by loiswakeman on 07 Apr. 2008
  6. Flying penguins
    by loiswakeman on 02 Apr. 2008
  7. Exasperate and exacerbate
    by loiswakeman on 01 Apr. 2008
  8. Compliment and complement
    by loiswakeman on 21 Mar. 2008
  9. Extol and exhort
    by loiswakeman on 17 Mar. 2008
  10. Can I be bovvered?
    by loiswakeman on 11 Mar. 2008