<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>eye for information</title><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/</link><description>Ceramic penguins and anteaters, photography, recipes, web accessibility and usability, the natural world, rants about the misuse of English. What more do you want - excitement?</description><language>en-UK</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:Yeah, right</title><description>My father forwards all such things straight to the fraud squad!</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/11/18/yeah-right-7407034/#c11554660</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:25:24 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Yeah, right</title><description>The saddest thing is that some people must fall for it, or they wouldn't keep doing it!</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/11/18/yeah-right-7407034/#c11534024</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:05:19 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:The names fireworks call themselves</title><description>Those names are to match the, far too loud, noise that they now make! xx</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/11/05/the-names-fireworks-call-themselves-7313192/#c11415917</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:38:22 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:This little doggie...</title><description>Aw sweet!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
xx</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/10/28/this-little-doggie-7259879/#c11332776</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:18:35 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:The names caravans call themselves</title><description>I love stuff like this.</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2007/08/20/the_names_caravans_call_themselves~2839878/#c9834205</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 14:01:58 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:How to win friends and influence people (not)</title><description>if you're looking for bad grammar, go here: http://thedaylyfaultsoffaristotleconman.blogspot.com</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/30/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people-not-5477375/#c9210601</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:46:19 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:How to win friends and influence people (not)</title><description>I thought it was meant as a joke when I read the text!  :no:  I wonder if they are actually getting any clients with this advertisement!</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/30/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people-not-5477375/#c9028020</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:36:06 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:How to win friends and influence people (not)</title><description>Thanks Lois.... the funny thing is that even with all the weight loss I don't really look any different and my health problems are basically still there.  I've had a 'part diagnosis' and am just waiting (maybe that should be 'weighting'???? ;))for a few more results.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Then they'll say there's nothing they can do!  :roll:</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/30/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people-not-5477375/#c9002418</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:05:40 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:How to win friends and influence people (not)</title><description>I had to read that twice Mrs P: to the sounds of the signature tune from "Are you being served", I was thinking of you going up from 60 pounds, then I remembered you saying you'd aready gone down 50, so that made sense!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I am glad it's still working so well for you - but how are you apart from that, with all the mystery problems you were having?</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/30/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people-not-5477375/#c9002055</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:22:40 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:How to win friends and influence people (not)</title><description>Spose im lucky my weight stayed steady until i got older and now i dont care.lol.</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/30/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people-not-5477375/#c8980845</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:27:47 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:How to win friends and influence people (not)</title><description>Well said Lois.  TWATS!!  Really, what next.</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/30/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people-not-5477375/#c8956930</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:59:14 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:How to win friends and influence people (not)</title><description>I'm going to stick with my own diet, thanks!  I've just passed the 60pounds mark....</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/30/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people-not-5477375/#c8956914</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:57:43 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:How to win friends and influence people (not)</title><description>I think I'll pass on this diet  :))</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/30/how-to-win-friends-and-influence-people-not-5477375/#c8956420</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:15:30 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Emanate and - erm - what?</title><description>me too confussed.</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/19/emanate-and-erm-what-5406503/#c8895789</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:56:39 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Emanate and - erm - what?</title><description>I'm confuddled  :))&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
xx</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/19/emanate-and-erm-what-5406503/#c8852520</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:43:45 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Emanate and - erm - what?</title><description>Um... could "emanating off" in American mean "reflecting" or "bouncing off"... just guessing. &lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/19/emanate-and-erm-what-5406503/#c8850130</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:10:59 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Emanate and - erm - what?</title><description>It's defeated me too.  I think I prefer your cheesy version!</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/19/emanate-and-erm-what-5406503/#c8848671</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:26:22 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Flout and flaunt</title><description>Nicely put...</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/16/flout-and-flaunt-5389076/#c8848255</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:50:00 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Flout and flaunt</title><description>Hear! Hear! Foxwriter, some of them can be totally illiterate...when it comes to speaking English! However, let's not flaunt our superior linguistic skills! :)):))</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/16/flout-and-flaunt-5389076/#c8848156</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:39:38 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Flout and flaunt</title><description>I wonder if he believes that justice should be administered impartially or indifferently, or whether he believes the former has something to do with dislike while the latter means not very well?</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/16/flout-and-flaunt-5389076/#c8828958</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:08:04 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Flout and flaunt</title><description>I think the problem is that it is (incorrectly) assumed all lawyers are well educated people.</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/16/flout-and-flaunt-5389076/#c8822175</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:46:24 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Flout and flaunt</title><description>Mmmmm... but he does work for Eversheds and they're a bit of a joke. ;)</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/16/flout-and-flaunt-5389076/#c8821351</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:02:20 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Flout and flaunt</title><description>Perhaps he was a bit flustered being on the radio! xx</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2009/01/16/flout-and-flaunt-5389076/#c8821265</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:48:45 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:An upmarket charabanc?</title><description>Thanks for taking it so well!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I am sure the process itself is fine - but I have an irresistible urge to poke fun at unneccessary jargon.</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2007/05/03/an_upmarket_charabanc~2203331/#c8744005</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:02:26 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:An upmarket charabanc?</title><description>Hi there. It is the quaintly named Blaire Palmer here. I am delighted you enjoyed the colourful use of language on my website. But I am sorry to hear you have all had such a bad experience of professional development. When it is done well it really improves the way businesses are run and the lives of the people working there. When it is done badly it does more harm than good. Anyway, I am glad I sparked some interesting debate!</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2007/05/03/an_upmarket_charabanc~2203331/#c8739951</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:23:27 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Adults only...</title><description>Positively stratospheric, old bean. Actually, I doubt I'd understand it myself any longer - all the brain cells I used at the time have problably gone west since!</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2008/12/29/adults-only-5294455/#c8716139</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:40:08 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Adults only...</title><description>!!   Stands back in admiration.  !!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ah well, if you are writing for people like that, then you are on a higher plane than me. :)&lt;br&gt;
</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2008/12/29/adults-only-5294455/#c8714756</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:13:39 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Adults only...</title><description>My Dad used that too. He was raised on the Wirral.</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2008/12/29/adults-only-5294455/#c8674409</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:20:59 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Adults only...</title><description>I didn't mention 'Hell's bells and buckets of blood', a useful expression of extreme irritation. I recently heard Rob Bryden use this expression so it may actually be common useage is south Wales, but in Lincolnshire it seems to be unique to my sister and myself.</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2008/12/29/adults-only-5294455/#c8672654</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:37:11 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Adults only...</title><description>When I was a child a dressing-gown was a duff, and a poo was 'hardwork'. The latter is now obselete, but both derivations are easy enough. People who are a bit too 'up front' about their good works are 'uprighteous'. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
'See amid the winter's snow' is the 'school dinner carol': "See the tender lamb appears / Promised from eternal years".</description><link>http://i4info.blog.co.uk/2008/12/29/adults-only-5294455/#c8672584</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:31:47 +0100</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
